I am new here, so please be patient!!!
Yesterday my husband (Spazz in this forum)and I purchased the new 2006 Vulcan 900 Classic LT. What a GORGEOUS bike!!!
However, I am here to ask a question concerning the earlier 900's. While we were out riding around and visiting on the new bike, we were told something I found hard to believe. One person told us that this bike may be considered a "new model" simply because of some changes in the appearance and options. They claim they work with someone that owns a Vulcan 900 in the early 2000 model. Can this be true? I'm wondering if their co-worker owns a Vulcan 800 and they feel sure they heard Vulcan 900?!
My husband and I have been researching new bikes for many months. There has been alot of hype about this new 2006 model and how it is the first year that Kawasaki came out with a 900 mid-cruiser bike. I remember my brother owning a Kawasaki 900 years ago (early 80's), but it was called a Z...something...900. It wasn't a Vulcan.
Please help shed some light on this subject, if you can.