Kawasaki Motorcycle Forums banner

Study: Sport bikes dangerous

8.7K views 62 replies 34 participants last post by  rustygunner  
#1 ·
Now sure if this has been posted yet, but here is an interesting article.

2theadvocate.com | News | Study: Sport bikes dangerous — Baton Rouge, LA
Study: Sport bikes dangerous
Speed, lack of training prove deadly for some riders
By JARED JANES, Advocate staff writer
Published: Jul 8, 2008

Stephanie Futrell called her mother a few hours before midnight June 23 to tell her she would be home within an hour. Then she told her friends she was taking a short ride on the back of the sport bike.

“She was going to go up the road and come right back,” her mother, Cheryl Futrell, said. “She never made it back.”

Futrell, 19, died at a hospital June 25 from injuries she suffered two days earlier when the driver of the motorcycle she was a passenger on ran off the road near Port Vincent, ejecting Futrell and the 24-year-old driver, who were both wearing helmets.

Louisiana State Police booked the driver, Daniel Varnado, at the end of June on counts of careless operation and manslaughter, but both of Futrell’s parents said they do not blame him for the wreck.

What they question is whether the type of motorcycle Futrell was on and Varnado’s relative lack of experience on it might have played a role in the crash, said her father, Aubrey Futrell.

The sport bikes were linked in a national study to a disproportionate number of fatalities relative to the number of the sport bikes on the road. But motorcycle advocates say that a lack of proper training is a leading cause of fatalities on sport bikes.

Futrell said Varnado had the Suzuki GSX-R750 — a high performance racing bike that can reach speeds of up to 170 mph — for a short time before he took Stephanie Futrell for a ride along a stretch of La. 16.

A week earlier when Stephanie Futrell visited her father at his home in Jackson, Miss., for Father’s Day, Aubrey Futrell, a certified motorcycle safety instructor, took Stephanie Futrell for a ride on his touring motorcycle, he said. When his daughter expressed interest in buying a sport bike, he told her that was the only kind of motorcycle she could not have.

“Kids don’t understand how dangerous and unforgiving these (sport) bikes are,” he said. “It’s not a safe bike in my opinion to be on.”

Sport bikes are motorcycles built for racing but allowed on public streets. A popular choice for younger motorcycle riders because of their cheap price relative to their high performance, sport bikes usually produce more horsepower per pound than other motorcycles.

Since state and local agencies do not keep statistics on the number of registrations or fatalities by type of motorcycle, it’s impossible to tell what the fatality rate is in Louisiana for sport bikes, Louisiana State Police spokesman Trooper Johnnie Brown said.

Anecdotal evidence provided by troopers on the highways suggests there are more sport bikes on roadways than before, Brown said, but the same could be said for most motorcycles.

A rising number of motorcycle license registrations have become the norm nationwide with a 51 percent increase in registrations from 2000 to 2005, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. That coincides with an increase in the number of motorcycle fatalities.

In Louisiana, motorcycle license endorsements have increased 5 percent since the beginning of the year to 126,466, according to the state Office of Motor Vehicles. Also, from 1999 to 2007, motorcycle fatalities across Louisiana more than doubled from 41 to 88.

While those numbers are for all motorcycles, the authors of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study suggest that sport bikes and their more powerful sibling supersport bikes result in more fatalities than other types of bikes.

Supersport bikes made up less than 10 percent of registered motorcycles across the country in 2005 but accounted for more than 25 percent of the deaths, according to the study. The fatality rate of 22.5 deaths per 10,000 registered motorcycles for supersport bikes was almost four times higher than the rate of cruisers, the most common motorcycle seen on U.S. highways.

Motorcycles classified by the Insurance Institute as sport bikes had a much lower fatality rate of 10.7 deaths per 10,000 registered bikes, but the sport bike fatality rate was still higher than the other classifications of motorcycles.

The higher fatality rates for sport bikes may have less to do with their performance capabilities and more to do with the type of people who often ride them, said Warren Broussard, the president of the Motorcycle Awareness Campaign, a Louisiana group dedicated to improving motorcycle safety.

Broussard, who does not ride sport bikes, said responsible motorcyclists call those types of riders squids, which is derived from the words “squirrelly” and “kid.” They ride without proper safety equipment — perhaps in flip-flops and shorts — while performing at-risk behavior like speeding, weaving through traffic and popping wheelies.

In the study, the most common factors cited for fatal crashes on supersports bikes and sport bikes were driver error and speed. Speed was cited in 57 percent of fatal crashes on supersports bikes and 46 percent of fatalities on sport bikes. In contrast, speed was cited in 27 percent of fatal crashes on cruiser motorcycles and 22 percent of fatal crashes on touring motorcycles.

But Doug Coles, a member of the Louisiana Sportbike Association who has ridden the bikes for 30 years, said banning the bikes or limiting their speed — as the authors of the study suggest doing to reduce the risk of fatalities — is akin to doing the same for high performance automobiles, such as Porsches or Ferraris.

The best way to prevent deaths on sport bikes without punishing responsible riders is by requiring a three-day course before they can get a motorcycle endorsement, he said. Most often, Coles said, bikers have little training on motorcycles and are usually self-taught.

After ensuring all riders have training on the bikes at tracks where they can learn the intricacies of their bikes, he said, riders — not laws — must create a culture change that limits dangerous behavior.

The bikes may invite dangerous behavior, Coles said, but it’s the drivers who ultimately take the risks.

“It’s going to take a culture change; it’s going to take a mindset change,” he said. “And it’s going to take the motorcycle community to step up and make that happen.”
 
#4 ·
Sport bikes aren't any more dangerous than guns in responsible hands.

However, in irresponsible ones, they can be just as deadly.

It's about respecting the tool....and not acting like one.
 
#5 ·
The higher fatality rates for sport bikes may have less to do with their performance capabilities and more to do with the type of people who often ride them, said Warren Broussard.

The best way to prevent deaths on sport bikes [or any bike!] without punishing responsible riders is by requiring a three-day course before they can get a motorcycle endorsement, he said. Most often, Coles said, bikers have little training on motorcycles and are usually self-taught.

After ensuring all riders have training on the bikes at tracks where they can learn the intricacies of their bikes, he said, riders — not laws — must create a culture change that limits dangerous behavior.
I hope the legislators skip the title of the article and focus on the important aspects. This is a very dubious study with particularly harmful recommendations. I think their results are flawed, and serve only to highlight an agenda. Frankly, I believe sport bikes are safer than cruisers strictly from a performance / handling standpoint, but it's awfully hard to make that case in court when you're defending against a parent with a dead child. So sad, and so unnecessary.
 
#6 ·
If they blame the riders, their survivors can't get paid. Therefore, it's the motorcycles fault. :mad:
I've never been a fan of their "reports", and I put no faith in most experts. If you use a machine the wrong way, you may get hurt. I don't need an "expert" to tell me that.
I was an avid 3-wheeler back in the early 80s, and I can remember watching Barbara Walters cry on national TV about the dangers of ATCs, and I just knew I had seen the death of my favorite pastime. Soon after, nobody made trikes anymore, only quads. I'm sure there is someone out there right now, screaming to outlaw sportbikes. Soon to be followed by the lawyers filing a class action suit to force a nationwide recall and financial settlement.
 
#7 ·
For argument's sake, let's just eliminate the existance of 'sports bikes' for a moment and just assume that the only bikes available are cruisers. The same types of people with the same personalities and attitudes would still want a bike, and would just buy whatever is available and drive them beyond the bike's or their own capabilities. The fact that a racing-style bike with flashy fairings and colors appeals to careless speed freaks only makes sense. What self-respecting maniac wants to be seen flying through town popping wheelies on a Goldwing? Logic dictates that it's not the bike, it's the rider because if sport bikes didn't exist, the idiots would just find something else to ride stupidly.
 
#8 ·
whatever...as stated the bike is only as dangerous as the rider. that guy was inexperienced and should NOT have carried a passenger. he probably never has before! yes, sportbikes are fast and can be unforgiving. just dont ride above your abilities and youll be fine. i havent had the slightest urge to try and pop a wheelie going 70 down the highway, do a burnout, stoppie, or anything like that. its stupid to do that on public roads.

i just did my first highway ride today actually! got up to 70 (indicated...probably slower than that though in reality) and i just took it easy. it was just a couple miles on the way home from work to familiarize myself with my bike at highway speeds. it was pleasant and fun. i didnt need to hit 100 MPH or do a wheelie to enjoy myself!

but some people just cant hold back. even on a cruiser you can do 100 MPH and do stupid things and kill yourself. sporties are just more popular for younger people who dont have much self control, sad to say.

i feel so bad for her family.
 
#9 ·
Sport bikes aren't any more dangerous than guns in responsible hands.

However, in irresponsible ones, they can be just as deadly.

It's about respecting the tool....and not acting like one.
I didn't comment when I posted the article, but this is exactly how I feel. I would like to see Louisiana tighten up the educational requirements to get a MC endorsement, and maybe even consider making the MSF BRC mandatory, but blaming the motorcycle is just dumb.
 
#10 ·
I sure do see my share of idiots on cruisers, too. And I agree with you Robert, MSF class should be mandatory. Free, but mandatory. Used to be you had to take drivers ed to get your license. Whatever happened to that?
 
#11 ·
I love stupid people who like to point the finger. The rider and passenger made poor choices and paid for it with their lives. No one's fault but their own. Now, if the bike had blown up due to faulty manufacturing then yes, it's the bike's fault. Then again...the spoon made me fat.

Now...using these stats to get rid of the bikes or something is stupid. But guess what...this is why you pay higher insurance for these sort of bikes. Has little to do with the bike itself. Has everything to do with what type of rider tends to choose this bike. Owning one may not mean necessarily you'll speed or anything, but the likely-hood of it is higher.
 
#13 ·
I sure do see my share of idiots on cruisers, too. And I agree with you Robert, MSF class should be mandatory. Free, but mandatory. Used to be you had to take drivers ed to get your license. Whatever happened to that?
There has never been a requirement for Driver's Ed. You've always been able to go in and take the road test if you were of legal driving age. Some states do require you to have a permit for a certain time before that, though. Driver's Ed has always been optional - it was just offered in schools more often than it is now. Budget cuts have taken away one of the few things students really would use outside of high school.

There used to be a nice discount with most insurance companies for doing so, but even that is more rare today than it used to be.
 
#14 ·
I really wish there was a requirement for driver's ed. Young drivers are getting worse and worse it seems, and many more actually have vehicles at their disposal vs. when I was a kid. Not to mention that when I was a kid there were no cell phones distracting drivers, which is a staple for kids nowadays. The DMV tests are a joke, and the test administrators have no requirement to actually teach any driving skills. Their sole purpose is to pass or fail the person taking the test.

There should also be a nationwide ban on talking on the cell phone without a hands-free device with penalties equivalent to DUI.

I hate to say it, but I am almost to the point where I think the MSF BRC should be a requirement to operate a motorcycle. I hate the thought of more legislation to protect us from ourselves, but things are out of control, and without it I fear that the extreme anti-motorcycle ideas may gain more traction with our lawmakers.
 
#16 ·
I suppose they would make the same statement, "we don't blame him for the wreck", if Daniel had wrapped a car or pickup truck around a tree and killed their daughter. That logic is so indicative of our politically correct, litigious, liberal thinking society. Don't make anyone responsible for any action they take. These type of stories make it hard to be a calm road pirate.
Arrrrr
 
#17 ·
I made a promise to myself when i started riding, that I would have fun, occasionally go fast, be careful and not wad up my bike and myself like so much garbage. So far so good. It's about decision making not the type of bike you ride. Of course I'm 43, at 19 I would have hurt myself.
 
#18 ·
A mandatory MSF course for an M endorsement is just so much regulatory stroking. I'll bet that the number of young sport bike riders that have no endorsement is quite high.

One could set up all manner of regulatory roadblocks, but the young studs are 10 feet tall and bullet proof and will find a way to ride. Anyone trying to argue that a cruiser is "safer" than a sport bike likely also believes that an "assault rifle" is inherently more dangerous than a shotgun. As afore written, the problem isn't the tool, it's the tool running it.
 
#19 ·
it is not the bikes fault at all, it is most definitly the riders fault, I wonder if they were both wearing other protective gear.

This reminds me of the whole gun thing, "guns kill people" its funny, if guns went around killing people it would be a very scary place to live.

Sadly this has to happen to an unknowing and trusting passenger, my advice to any girl or guy for that matter who wants to ride on the bike of a bike, go research it first and tell your driver to go slow, and be sure to wear all the protective gear you can.

If your driver has never taken the MSF course, do not ride with them

kenny
 
#20 ·
I get so sick of everyone blaming everything except the guilty party. I mean come on! It wasn't the riders fault??? Then who's fault was it? The bike only does what its told. Sorry but he is the reason she's dead! His lack of respnsibility.
+1

I know this might take this thread way off course, but this struck me about the same as someone crying that guns kill people. The bike didn't kill anyone....the IDIOT did!

And by the say...That person on ANY motorcycle would have had a bad result...it's not JUST sportbikes.

Geez!
 
#21 ·
This ****es me off but what ****es me off even more are the idiots i see everyday around here riding wheelies down the streets and on the freeways, its getting to the point where its expected of us. I can't even count the times I've been at the front of a red light and some teenager gives me the "Do a wheelie" motion, I can see him going out and getting a Gixxer 1000 when he turns 16.
 
#22 ·
This ****es me off but what ****es me off even more are the idiots i see everyday around here riding wheelies down the streets and on the freeways, its getting to the point where its expected of us. I can't even count the times I've been at the front of a red light and some teenager gives me the "Do a wheelie" motion, I can see him going out and getting a Gixxer 1000 when he turns 16.
i agree to a point, but i would blame the parents if when the kid turns 17 or 18 he gets a bike and goes and gets hurt bad, a good parent would know their child is interesting in riding motorcycles, a good parent would make sure the child takes the necessary courses before riding, a good parent would not allow their child to get too much bike the first time around


im like a little kid now, I want a Z1000, I have ridden a GSX-R750 - great bike, but kids will be kids, they like tricks and stunts and they also like big trucks and fast cars.

I am not saying its good for bikers to do tricks and stunts, but beleive me just cause a kid sees some guy do it, does not mean they want to run out and get a sport bike.

take my child hood, I thought it was the coolest thing to see somebody popping a wheelie, my first bike is about as fast as a snail who had too much ice cream when compared to sport bikes.

kenny
kenny
 
#24 ·
i agree to a point, but i would blame the parents if when the kid turns 17 or 18 he gets a bike and goes and gets hurt bad, a good parent would know their child is interesting in riding motorcycles, a good parent would make sure the child takes the necessary courses before riding, a good parent would not allow their child to get too much bike the first time around
Gee, I guess I'm lucky to have survived, since I didn't have "good parents" (by your definition)!

Oh, wait, I DID have good parents -- who taught me to rely on JUDGMENT, whatever I was doing, whether there was a "course" or not!

Years ago, I taught traffic school. I showed the blood pics, I had stories to tell, and NOBODY left without knowing a lot more about safety on the road . . .and it didn't do one bit of good! The students came in two types, those who were good drivers but got got for a small infraction, and those who were dangerous and continued to be dangerous. They weren't there to become better, they were there to keep from seeing their insurance rates go up.

I've seen more that one squid who had gone through the MSF course. It only teaches those who wish to learn.
 
#26 ·
The Navy has had 27 motorcycle deaths this fiscal year of which 25 were sportsbikes. The Navy and USMC along with MSF developed a sportsbike rider class that is mandatory for all who own or drive a sportsbike. The stats were 18 to 25 years old. They did not give riding experience in those stats or the size of bikes. I have seen it several times where a young sailor buys his first bike and never have ridden one before go get a GSXR 1000. The salesman should not be allowed to tell them it is all about throttle control.