These are what I consider the ''baddest'' Kaw sport bikes between 1980-1990:
Kawasaki GPz750: ?
Kawasaki GPz1100: 135 MPH
Kawasaki GPz750 Turbo: 148 MPH
Kawasaki GPZ900R: 151-158 MPH
Kawasaki GPZ1000RX: ?
Kawasaki ZX-10 Tomcat: 167 MPH
Kawasaki ZX-11: 176 MPH
All of these speeds are taken from Wikipedia.
The first thing that strikes me as odd is how the GPz1100 couldn't manage more than 135 MPH, something even unfaired bike with much less power in the 1970's could supposedly hit? Meanwhile the Turbo could almost match the GPZ900R both in top speed and acceleration.
I'm a big fan of the GPZ900R (One of my favourite bikes) and I've seen all types of weird performance figures for it. Does a 0-100 MPH in 7 seconds sound plausible for the bike? A McLaren F1 does 0-100 MPH in 6.3 seconds, could the 900R really challenge that thing to 100 or in the quarter mile?
If you look at most road tests they got an 11-ish second or slower 1/4 time with trap speeds ranging from 112 to 125 MPH. Top speeds are also pretty puzzling because some tests with a great quarter mile only managed a top speed of 140 MPH or less without the gearing limiting top speed, while some tests with pretty bad quarter mile trap speeds hit 155 MPH flat out.
The Tomcat and ZX-11 speeds seem pretty believeable to me, with the improved aerodynamics and increased power, I've seen some tests of the ZX-11 get up to 179 MPH. Primarily some tests by a magazine called ''Motosprint'' that seems to be in Spanish or Italian, they always have REALLY good performance figures (Almost unbeliveable sometimes), however I can't find out much about them nowadays.
Anyone have some insight on this? I'm guessing you guys have some more experience with these older (and cooler than modern) bikes.
Kawasaki GPz750: ?
Kawasaki GPz1100: 135 MPH
Kawasaki GPz750 Turbo: 148 MPH
Kawasaki GPZ900R: 151-158 MPH
Kawasaki GPZ1000RX: ?
Kawasaki ZX-10 Tomcat: 167 MPH
Kawasaki ZX-11: 176 MPH
All of these speeds are taken from Wikipedia.
The first thing that strikes me as odd is how the GPz1100 couldn't manage more than 135 MPH, something even unfaired bike with much less power in the 1970's could supposedly hit? Meanwhile the Turbo could almost match the GPZ900R both in top speed and acceleration.
I'm a big fan of the GPZ900R (One of my favourite bikes) and I've seen all types of weird performance figures for it. Does a 0-100 MPH in 7 seconds sound plausible for the bike? A McLaren F1 does 0-100 MPH in 6.3 seconds, could the 900R really challenge that thing to 100 or in the quarter mile?
If you look at most road tests they got an 11-ish second or slower 1/4 time with trap speeds ranging from 112 to 125 MPH. Top speeds are also pretty puzzling because some tests with a great quarter mile only managed a top speed of 140 MPH or less without the gearing limiting top speed, while some tests with pretty bad quarter mile trap speeds hit 155 MPH flat out.
The Tomcat and ZX-11 speeds seem pretty believeable to me, with the improved aerodynamics and increased power, I've seen some tests of the ZX-11 get up to 179 MPH. Primarily some tests by a magazine called ''Motosprint'' that seems to be in Spanish or Italian, they always have REALLY good performance figures (Almost unbeliveable sometimes), however I can't find out much about them nowadays.
Anyone have some insight on this? I'm guessing you guys have some more experience with these older (and cooler than modern) bikes.